| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
942
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 20:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Malcanis may have not been the CSM you wanteed but he was the one you deserved and I agree
He has been a hero in these threads.
Read back. He stood in front of the mob, demanding due process and then has been tryiong to explain to you that due process has now taken place
When things don't go your way don't blame Atticus Finch
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
945
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 20:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Not willfull ignorance.
People want a clear line so they can dance right up to it, Xenos paradox style
No, The line is in shadow, determined on a case by case basis. Dance near it and accept the risk or exercise some retraint and be risk free. You cvan still scam, strill explode ships, still awox
What I do not understand is why you WANT to do more
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
947
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 21:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
Ah, the CSM position is "if they want to ban you they will and Im fine with that" Why didnt you just say that?
Because that is not what I said or meant.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
955
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 22:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Coffee Rocks wrote: Please, continue debating CCP and the CSM on what they've made perfectly clear. If you are still fuzzy and can't understand it by now, chances are you might be next.
Dammit Coffee, do you have to encourage them?
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
965
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 19:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
Moja Hinken wrote:Don't understand why you all are trying to debate with Lucas Kell and Danalee. It has been made very clear to us how CCP feels. It has been made very clear to both of them individually by several of you. They are either trolls or the dumbest people I have ever met.
does it have to be an either or, here?
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
967
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 21:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
I did not call anyone stupid (that you know of)
I asked why the choice was binary . . . . why either/or not both (or neither)
But if you wish to take offence I am curious. Should I be banned? If you don't take offence but a third person does for you, then falls the banhammer?
If CCP decides I am just being a smart ass (as I occasionally am) and that any offence taken (by victim or third party) is overdoing it do they have the right to choose whether to ban me or not, based on their own judgement?
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
967
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 21:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jayem See wrote:
That response was almost as late as the minutes! Good job!
I was out for a while in this thing called the real world.
Over rated.
Actually I am trying to get out of here but I have so much time invested I keep feeling like I am drawn back in involuntarily.
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
967
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 21:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jayem See wrote: Just a question - and very off topic. Once CSM member has moved on can they then discuss stuff like this or is it covered by NDA? I assume it would be (not to mention being bad form) but just wondered.
I am not joking, here.
The NDA is NDA'd
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |
| |
|